<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://triseminars.com/Blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog</link>
	<description>Sandy Botkin, CPA, Esq.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 13:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What I learned from law school admission by Sandytaxman</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=125#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandytaxman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 13:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=125#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I forgot one major factor for admission. Most law school admissions are rolling admission. This means that the earlier you generally apply , the better your chances become. It logically follows that the later you apply, the harder it gets. This may not be universal but it is true for many schools. 

Also, if you have already received a rejection, and suddenly find out that you did much better on a later LSAT,generally law schools won&#039;t reconsider your application. You will have to wait until the next admission cycle ( which is the following year) for the new LSAT scores to be considered. Likewise, if you apply to a law school while telling them that you are taking the upcoming LSAT, they will wait for the latest scores before making a decision. Once a decision is made, it is usually final, although I have seen a few law schools allow for an appeal if made within 30 days of the decision.

Also ALWAYS check with &quot;Law School Predictor.&quot; This is a tool that you can find using Google that will give you a pretty good estimate of your chances for admission at most law schools. You need to know your GPA and LSAT score. I have found this tool to be fairly accurate. The only exception is that some lower tiered schools such as Florida Coastal and NOVA, Widener et. al. have an summer qualification program as an alternative admission for lower LSAT applicants. These programs give an intensive 6 week law school course and admit about 30%-50% of the students from these alternative programs to the law school. The calculator doesn&#039;t factor in those types of schools,which are fairly few in number.

Even worse, these alternative admission programs don&#039;t give law school credit since the student isn&#039;t officially admitted to the law school. This is not due to the schools being cheap but rather due to the ABA requirement that law school credit can only be given to admitted students.

One notable exception to this is Ohio Northern. They have a summer program for kids that have high GPAs but lower LSATs. However, with this program you are officially an admitted student. Thus, their summer program does qualify for law school credit.

My suggestion is to opt out of these alternative programs that are simply qualifying for law school admission since they are simply cash cows for the universities sponsoring them. The only reason to accept them are:

1. You REALLY want to go to that particular law school and it was the only choice since you didn&#039;t get in via regular admission, OR

2. You didn&#039;t get accepted into an ABA accredited law school, and the alternative admission program was your only choice. Even then, I probably would reconsider law school and suggest retaking the LSAT.

My final point (until I can think of other omissions) is that some non-ABA accredited law schools might be a good alternative IF you practice in the state that the law school is located. An example would be Mass College of Law that is NOT accredited by the ABA. However, if you go there and pass the MASS bar, you can practice in Mass and some other states and eventually become able to practice in most states via reciprocity. These non ABA accredited schools are much cheaper too. I normally don&#039;t recommend these because you are limited as to where you can practice and your credits don&#039;t transfer to an ABA school if you ever want to transfer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I forgot one major factor for admission. Most law school admissions are rolling admission. This means that the earlier you generally apply , the better your chances become. It logically follows that the later you apply, the harder it gets. This may not be universal but it is true for many schools. </p>
<p>Also, if you have already received a rejection, and suddenly find out that you did much better on a later LSAT,generally law schools won&#8217;t reconsider your application. You will have to wait until the next admission cycle ( which is the following year) for the new LSAT scores to be considered. Likewise, if you apply to a law school while telling them that you are taking the upcoming LSAT, they will wait for the latest scores before making a decision. Once a decision is made, it is usually final, although I have seen a few law schools allow for an appeal if made within 30 days of the decision.</p>
<p>Also ALWAYS check with &#8220;Law School Predictor.&#8221; This is a tool that you can find using Google that will give you a pretty good estimate of your chances for admission at most law schools. You need to know your GPA and LSAT score. I have found this tool to be fairly accurate. The only exception is that some lower tiered schools such as Florida Coastal and NOVA, Widener et. al. have an summer qualification program as an alternative admission for lower LSAT applicants. These programs give an intensive 6 week law school course and admit about 30%-50% of the students from these alternative programs to the law school. The calculator doesn&#8217;t factor in those types of schools,which are fairly few in number.</p>
<p>Even worse, these alternative admission programs don&#8217;t give law school credit since the student isn&#8217;t officially admitted to the law school. This is not due to the schools being cheap but rather due to the ABA requirement that law school credit can only be given to admitted students.</p>
<p>One notable exception to this is Ohio Northern. They have a summer program for kids that have high GPAs but lower LSATs. However, with this program you are officially an admitted student. Thus, their summer program does qualify for law school credit.</p>
<p>My suggestion is to opt out of these alternative programs that are simply qualifying for law school admission since they are simply cash cows for the universities sponsoring them. The only reason to accept them are:</p>
<p>1. You REALLY want to go to that particular law school and it was the only choice since you didn&#8217;t get in via regular admission, OR</p>
<p>2. You didn&#8217;t get accepted into an ABA accredited law school, and the alternative admission program was your only choice. Even then, I probably would reconsider law school and suggest retaking the LSAT.</p>
<p>My final point (until I can think of other omissions) is that some non-ABA accredited law schools might be a good alternative IF you practice in the state that the law school is located. An example would be Mass College of Law that is NOT accredited by the ABA. However, if you go there and pass the MASS bar, you can practice in Mass and some other states and eventually become able to practice in most states via reciprocity. These non ABA accredited schools are much cheaper too. I normally don&#8217;t recommend these because you are limited as to where you can practice and your credits don&#8217;t transfer to an ABA school if you ever want to transfer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update on Roth Conversions: Great secret tip by Sandytaxman</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=121#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandytaxman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=121#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Actually, the time limit for recharacterizing the conversion is the due date for the tax return including extensions, which can go until October 15. Thus, if you do a Roth Conversion in 2011, you have until October of 2012  or when you file your 2011 tax return,  if you file your return before that date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the time limit for recharacterizing the conversion is the due date for the tax return including extensions, which can go until October 15. Thus, if you do a Roth Conversion in 2011, you have until October of 2012  or when you file your 2011 tax return,  if you file your return before that date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The borrow-sale technique by Sandytaxman</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=119#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandytaxman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=119#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I wanted to add something. You would use stock that pays enough dividends to about cover the interest. Secondly, this strategy only should be  used if you have a great investment need for the money that will give you a substantial rate of return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to add something. You would use stock that pays enough dividends to about cover the interest. Secondly, this strategy only should be  used if you have a great investment need for the money that will give you a substantial rate of return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eliminating commuting by Tweets that mention New Blog Post: Eliminating commuting -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=109#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention New Blog Post: Eliminating commuting -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=109#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ulrike Singer-Bayrle, Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: Eliminating commuting http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=109 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ulrike Singer-Bayrle, Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: Eliminating commuting <a href="http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=109" rel="nofollow">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=109</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gift-Leaseback by Tweets that mention Gift-Leaseback &#124; -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=107#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Gift-Leaseback &#124; -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=107#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ulrike Singer-Bayrle, Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: Gift-Leaseback http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=107 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ulrike Singer-Bayrle, Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: Gift-Leaseback <a href="http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=107" rel="nofollow">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=107</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Credit card scams by Tweets that mention Credit card scams &#124; -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=103#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Credit card scams &#124; -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=103#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq and Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: Credit card scams http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=103 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq and Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: Credit card scams <a href="http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=103" rel="nofollow">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=103</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asset Protection: Where to incorporate by Tweets that mention Asset Protection: Where to incorporate &#124; -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=99#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Asset Protection: Where to incorporate &#124; -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=99#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sharingrealinfo, Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq and others. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: Asset Protection: Where to incorporate http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=99 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sharingrealinfo, Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq and others. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: Asset Protection: Where to incorporate <a href="http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=99" rel="nofollow">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=99</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asset protection for investment real estate. by Tweets that mention Asset protection for investment real estate. &#124; -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=95#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Asset protection for investment real estate. &#124; -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=95#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by powerinthemoney. powerinthemoney said: RT @SandyTaxMan: Asset protection for investment real estate. http://bit.ly/hYpSqA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by powerinthemoney. powerinthemoney said: RT @SandyTaxMan: Asset protection for investment real estate. <a href="http://bit.ly/hYpSqA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hYpSqA</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deductible holiday,birthday and other gifts as business gifts by Tweets that mention Deductible holiday,birthday and other gifts as business gifts &#124; -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=87#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Deductible holiday,birthday and other gifts as business gifts &#124; -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 23:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=87#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Hinshaw. David Hinshaw said: RT @SandyTaxMan: Deductible holiday,birthday and other gifts as business gifts http://bit.ly/gC0KbY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by David Hinshaw. David Hinshaw said: RT @SandyTaxMan: Deductible holiday,birthday and other gifts as business gifts <a href="http://bit.ly/gC0KbY" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/gC0KbY</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the best tax advantaged vehicles to buy in 2011? by Tweets that mention What is the best tax advantaged vehicles to buy in 2011? &#124; -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=91#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What is the best tax advantaged vehicles to buy in 2011? &#124; -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 21:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=91#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq, Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=91 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq, Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq. Sandy Botkin,CPA,Esq said: New Blog Post: <a href="http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=91" rel="nofollow">http://triseminars.com/Blog/?p=91</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

